<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danrosenthal.org &#187; Guest Articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danrosenthal.org/category/news/guest-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danrosenthal.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Russian Piracy Backlash</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danrosenthal.org/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gamepolitics has an interesting piece (not written by me) linking to an article about Microsoft&#8217;s Russian anti-piracy enforcement backlash. Interestingly, the source of the piece comes from the American University, Washington College of Law Intellectual Property Brief, which I co-founded and was the first Senior Web Editor. I still host the IP Brief today, pro [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gamepolitics has an<a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/25/microsoft-learns-lesson-about-copyright-enforcement"> interesting piece</a> (not written by me) linking to an article about Microsoft&#8217;s Russian anti-piracy enforcement backlash. Interestingly, the source of the piece comes from the <a href="http://www.ipbrief.net/2010/09/23/microsoft-changes-policy-no-longer-supports-russian-crackdowns-on-ngo%E2%80%99s/">American University, Washington College of Law Intellectual Property Brief</a>, which I co-founded and was the first Senior Web Editor. I still host the IP Brief today, pro bono. Kudos to them for making it to GP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Russian Piracy Backlash</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/blog/2010/9/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/microsofts-russian-piracy-backlash-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of Autodesk v. Vernor impact on games</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autodesk v. vernor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danrosenthal.org/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written a fairly long and rather controversial analysis of Autodesk v. Vernor, and its potential impact on the games industry over at Gamepolitics. The general consensus developing is that the lawyers agree with me and the non-lawyers disagree. What are your thoughts on the decision?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written a fairly long and rather controversial <a href="www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/20/autodesk-eulas-and-games-oh-boy">analysis of Autodesk v. Vernor, and its potential impact on the games industry</a> over at <a href="www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/20/autodesk-eulas-and-games-oh-boy">Gamepolitics</a>. The general consensus developing is that the lawyers agree with me and the non-lawyers disagree. What are your thoughts on the decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of Autodesk v. Vernor Impact on Games</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/blog/2010/9/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/25/analysis-of-autodesk-v-vernor-impact-on-games-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GameStop Stores on Military Bases Won’t Sell MOH</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danrosenthal.org/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit delayed, but I have an article up from late last week discussing AAFES and Gamestop&#8217;s decision  that &#8220;out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform we will not carry Medal of Honor in any of our AAFES based stores&#8221;. As a combat veteran and a gamer, I am [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit delayed, but I have an article up from late last week discussing AAFES and Gamestop&#8217;s decision  that &#8220;out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform we will not carry Medal of Honor in any of our AAFES based stores&#8221;. As a combat veteran and a gamer, I am disgusted and appalled by this attempt at censorship by AAFES bureaucrats that have not been subjected to the dangers and risks that our combat veterans are exposed to on a daily basis. Simply put, it&#8217;s not for them to decide; especially not on such a subjective basis that games where the player can be a terrorist are allowed, or games where players can commit virtual violations of the UCMJ. It is an utterly ridiculous decision, and is a slap in the face of our troops, who need all the fun that they can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GameStop Stores on Military Bases Won’t Sell MOH</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/blog/2010/9/8/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-wont-sell-moh.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/08/gamestop-stores-on-military-bases-won%e2%80%99t-sell-moh-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article: More on FCC&#8217;s Rejection of Free Broadband</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danrosenthal.org/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a new article up at Gamepolitics.com, expanding a bit further on their previous story regarding the FCC&#8217;s announcement that it rejected a plan that would bring free broadband internet to 95% of the country. The reasons behind that rejection may be more complicated than you might think. Check it out here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/02/more-fcc039s-rejection-free-wireless-broadband">new article up at Gamepolitics.com</a>, expanding a bit further on their <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/01/boot-head-free-broadband-wireless-plan-not-wanted-fcc">previous story</a> regarding the FCC&#8217;s announcement that it rejected a plan that would bring free broadband internet to 95% of the country. The reasons behind that rejection may be more complicated than you might think. Check it out <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/09/02/more-fcc039s-rejection-free-wireless-broadband">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Article: More on FCC&#8217;s Rejection of Free Broadband</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/blog/2010/9/2/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/09/02/new-article-more-on-fccs-rejection-of-free-broadband-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GP Article: Starcraft II Sales Not Meeting Expectations.</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danrosenthal.org/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;m still slogging my way through the (admittedly pretty awesome) singleplayer campaign on Starcraft II, I did take some time to cover the launch week sales numbers. It seems to be the hot button topic to try and predict how well Starcraft II will do this year. My predictions are being revised upward a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;m still slogging my way through the (admittedly pretty awesome) singleplayer campaign on Starcraft II, I did take some time to <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2010/08/05/sc2-sales-great-not-good-expected">cover the launch week sales numbers</a>. It seems to be the hot button topic to try and predict how well Starcraft II will do this year. My predictions are being revised upward a little bit,  and I think it has a fair chance of doing 5 million worldwide, with the key factor for me being how well the game sells with the OS X market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GP Article: Starcraft II Sales Not Meeting Expectations.</title>
		<link>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations-2/</link>
		<comments>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rosenthal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GamePolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameslaw.net/blog/2010/8/6/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danrosenthal.org/2010/08/06/gp-article-starcraft-ii-sales-not-meeting-expectations-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

